Programs
What the panel currently says about each business program — and, just as deliberately, what it cannot say yet. Every gap below is something only the program itself can close.
| Program | Postings | AI share, ATS panel | AI share, The Muse | Supplied by the program |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Systems | 151,047 | 73.4% | 37.1% | nothing yet |
| Sales | 44,082 | 77.4% | 34.4% | nothing yet |
| Business Management | 43,362 | 67.3% | 30.1% | nothing yet |
| Marketing | 27,193 | 74.8% | 36.8% | 75 titles, 0 employers |
| Strategic Management | 15,387 | 80.9% | 38.9% | nothing yet |
| Finance | 10,244 | 67.9% | 14.4% | nothing yet |
| Human Resource Management | 7,921 | 68.3% | 26.7% | nothing yet |
| Accounting | 7,687 | 65.2% | 26.9% | nothing yet |
| Experience Design and Management | 6,953 | 70.5% | 43.1% | nothing yet |
| Global Supply Chain Management | 5,041 | 33.2% | 10.2% | nothing yet |
| Entrepreneurial Management | 1,144 | n too small | n too small | nothing yet |
The two AI-share columns are never averaged. They apply the same test to two samples chosen for opposite reasons: the ATS panel exists because those employers post AI-related work, The Muse does not. The distance between them is the finding.
If you lead one of these programs. Two things change what this page can say about your major: the job titles your graduates actually take, and the employers who actually hire them. Titles become classifier rules, so the panel stops mislabelling your discipline. Employers become collection targets, so their postings enter the corpus at all.
Sign in to add them, or tell us what you would want analysed.